Modern SWTOR Part I: Launch to the "Knights of" era

Since about January my main MMO has been Star Wars: The Old Republic.  It is likely roughly tied with Lord of the Rings Online for the game that I actively played for the longest stretch.  I subbed up the day of launch in December 2011, and stayed subbed until the 5.2 patch after Iokath was released, which I believe was in April 2017.  That is nearly six solid years subbed up and logging in, which for me is a hell of a long run on any game.  I love the Star Wars setting, and I love the variety of outcomes you can get on different playthroughs of SWTOR due to each class having a different 1-50 story, and dialogue choices.  For most that that time I was happy as a clam, or a pig in mud, or whatever your favorite animal based euphemism for contentment may be. Unfortunately, Bioware seemed to completely lose their way  around 2016 with the launch of Knights of the Fallen Empire and Knights of the Eternal Throne, and to my tastes it took a really long time for the game to recover.

Shown here is a map of one part of Corellia,  and the kind of content I was accustomed to until Knights of the Fallen Empire came out.  The map on the left is the zone I am currently exploring, which has a ton of nooks and crannies, places that serve no purpose save to enhance immersion like a bar with a working juke box, and perhaps a dozen quests.  This is itself just one zone of a larger planet, which has five areas of roughly the same size.  The switch from this style of expansive explorable content to the tiny zones with little to see of the "Knight's of" expansions, cerca 2016, felt like a major downgrade to me.  It took years for the developers to get back to this style of worldbuilding.  

I had a lot of issues with the game during the "Knights of" era.  My biggest gripe was the switch from open world areas, that felt like actual planets, to a really linear storyline that played like a visual novel and a MMO had a love child. That isn't to say that the expansions didn't have some engaging stories in them.  There are actually excellent on your first playthrough, and I enjoyed them quite a bit when they first came out.  Both Knights of expansions contain polished content with high production values, and feel very cinematic the first time you see them.  However, they offer very little new on subsequent playthroughs. Choices offered turn out to be largely flavor once you have tried out several of them, and Empire and Republic characters get completely identical stories.  In addition there are very few open world exploration zones, and even in those few little really worth discovering. Perhaps worst of all, the moment-to-moment gameplay consists largely of cutscenes interspersed with some of the most bland and repetitive fights SWTOR has to offer.  Tons of nearly identical corridors are stuffed with mobs that you have to take down to progress to the next cutscene.    

This is the view out of the republic spaceport on Corellia. It's likely one of the least attractive planets in the game, and I still think it's an impressive sight. This also is a  tiny section of the map above. Even back in 2011 SWTOR was considered an ugly game by many, and nowadays the graphics are often considered almost laughably bad.  Maybe it's because I grew up in the Atari / Nintendo era, but I have always found these criticisms completely baffling.  For a game that runs well on a toaster, I think the graphics are quite impressive. 

So in KotET and KotFE, we got expansions that for me were strong at first glance but rapidly became really boring on repeated playthroughs.  This was in sharp contrast to the rest of the game where high replayability was a major strength.  Overall, the gameplay in KoTET and KotFE ended up feeling like a major downgrade compared to the game up until that point.  For me that was compounded by the gearing system of the 5.0 era.  Until 5.0 end game instances and PvP rewarded points that you could save up and use to eventually buy the gear set of your choice, like pretty much every other MMO.  However, Bioware seemed to think this was letting players gear up too quickly at the cap.  Seemingly in an attempt to try and stretch out the endgame, SWTOR  switched to a "command crates"  system where you were rewarded crates yielding gear completely at random.  The odds of any given crate having a piece of gear that was an upgrade you needed got lower and lower the closer you were to a full set at a given item level.  It was incredibly frustrating to open several crates in a row and get vendor trash out of all of them.  

As in most MMOs, the true endgame is fashion for players that aren't heavily into raiding or PvP, and SWTOR (often called "space Barbie" by players who have their tongues only slightly in their cheeks) is no different.  In fact, it's arguable better than most because in addition to your character there is a whole group of NPCs that you can also dress up.  Shown here is the squad of the current character I am playing, most of whom only have slight changes to their default gear (a helmet here, a pair of boots there).  Any humanoid companion is completely customizable, with six equipment slots to swap in and out in addition to various choices for their head.

Added to storyline that I found overly repetitive and a gearing system I hated, the pace of new content releases also started to slow to a crawl.  By Spring 2017 the only thing keeping me in the game was the hope that a new area coming out in April would be a return to form for the studio. Unfortunately, when it finally was released the new area ended up being Iokath.  To this day Iokath is probably the area of the game I enjoy the least on a normal 1-to-cap playthrough, and I cancelled my sub about a month after it came out.  After that, watching from the sidelines I saw what started as a slight content drought start to approach the Chilean desert of true maintenance mode.  

Even companions like M1-4X here, that don't wear equipment, have some customization options if you go hunting for them.  To get this paint job, I had to add two-factor authentication to my account and fly out to a space station at the edge of the galaxy to find the vendor that sold it.

After Iokath, no new explorable areas would be added until December 2018, nearly two years later.  Even that new area, Ossus*, only contained about four hours of new content.  Perhaps a week of evenings if you got serious about it and maxed out your local reputation with dailies. Stories in the gaming press of personnel assigned to SWTOR and financial resources that the game brought in being funneled into failed projects like Anthem did nothing to make me question my lack of loyalty.  For me, it only confirmed that I was right to walk away when I did.   

Flying in to Ossus to take screenshots. By the time Ossus came out it late 2018, I think Bioware had finally gotten the message that players really like having new areas worth exploring. Even a very slickly presented story isn't enough by itself to keep most players engaged, especially if it's essentially the exact same story every time you play it.

All of this kept me out of the game until Onslaught was released in late 2019.  By then it looked like enough new content, Ossus, Dantooine, and two new planets with Onslaught, had been added for it to be worth sticking my head in again.  I enjoyed Onslaught quite a bit, but it still only kept me entertained for a few months.  I considered coming back for Legacy of the Sith, but that turned out to be more like a nice patch than an actual expansion, with two or three hours of content for most players and not so much as a new daily area when it first launched.  For the last three years I have been keeping an eye on the game**, waiting for enough new content to come out for it to be worth subbing.  I would say as of the last big patch the game is finally there, and I think I'll be settling in for a while (eight months and counting).  

Once you land on Ossus you find an interesting set of zones with a unique orange sand on black basalt aesthetic, and a story that plays very differently depending on whether you are aligned with the Empire or the Republic.  Though not as large as most launch era planets, it does feel like a proper new area that is rewarding to explore.  

Based on what I've seen since I came back in January, I would say that the team has finally found their new groove.  There are a good bit of new content and activities to talk about.  It's not all peaches and kittens, but on the balance  the current game is better to my tastes than it has been in years. I thought that was what I sat down to write about, but my lead in completely got away from me.  More on the current game in the next post!

*Thought short, I did eventually find out that Ossus is excellent with a cool aesthetic and a fun little story.  That's actually a good synopsis of the modern team's development style.  They don't put out much content, but what they do release is well done and tends to feel like a solid addition to the game.

**By "keeping an eye on the game," I mainly mean reading Shintar's excellent  Going Commando.  She covers SWTOR really thoroughly, and has a generally sunny take on the game that I enjoy.   

On difficulty

In a recent post over at Parallel Context, Redbeard mentioned that he doesn't like playing a "godlike character."  His main point is that he finds it immersion breaking from a story perspective, and I completely agree with that.  However, that and another recent incident in SWTOR got me thinking about difficulty in MMOs more generally. 

There is a difficulty balance a MMO has to hit for me to stay engaged.  I play MMOs mainly to relax, so they can't be too hard.  If I get stressed out whenever I play a game, I won't play it for long.  What I do for a living is engaging and I am lucky, but it also gives me about all the stress I can handle.  At the same time, I also hate it when a MMO is too easy.  If I do something really stupid I deserve to die.  If it's almost literally impossible for me to get killed doing anything I normally do in the game, that feels too easy and kind of pointless.  

For example, the last time I played retail WoW, it was overall way too easy.  It wasn't a total deal breaker for me because I had Classic "right over there" on another server if I wanted it.  However it did mean that I got bored after very short stints doing overland quests when I was in Retail, and actually needed dungeon runs to break them up.  That is a strange way for me to play. Normally running around doing quests and soaking up storylines is my favorite activity in a MMO.  Becasue of this, during my last stay I spent most of my playtime in Classic.  To my tastes Classic gets the difficulty balance just right. Quests are rarely a huge challenge, but if you head into Murloc territory and start pulling solo, or do something similarly reckless, you will end up either going down in a blaze of glory or running for your life.  

EQ II, TSW and a few others with fixed difficulties also manage that tightrope walk using one challenge level for everyone and well balanced classes.  However, for the most part MMOs that get the difficulty "juuuust right" to my tastes are ones where you get to adjust the difficulty yourself.  Some older MMOs, like DAoC and EQ do it indirectly by simply having classes that vary wildly in the situations they can handle well when questing solo.  If I want slow but safe I can pick a melee class with good defense like a Paladin or Shadow Knight.  If I want something faster paced but risky, I can go with a squishy bolt caster like an Eldritch or Wizard.  And so on.  

Another tack that some MMOs have also started playing around  with is letting players actively and directly adjust the difficulty as they play.  For example, SWTOR does this in an really interesting way.  When questing solo you always have a companion out, and you can have your companion act as a healer, a tank or a DPS.  If you set the companion to healer, the game becomes very easy and you really have to go out of your way to get killed doing any but the hardest content.  At the opposite extreme, just normal questing can keep you on your toes if you set your companion to DPS (particularly once you get past the launch era content).  A DPS companion will merrily get killed right alongside you if you overpull. 

The MMO that has taken this to the greatest extreme, at least among ones I am familiar with, is  Dungeons and Dragons Online.  Every quest in the game has a variety of difficulty settings you can choose when you begin the quest.  If you want a challenge, you can crank the difficulty all the way up to Reaper 10 and get one shotted by trash mobs even on a very strong character.  At the opposite extreme, on Casual you could clear most quests with terrible character build while wearing pajamas and using an unenchanted club.  There are 12 difficulty setting in between those, so if you can't dial up the challenge you prefer you just don't know what you are doing.  

Of course DDO is also a weird edge case in a lot of ways.  Due to the extreme flexibility of the character creation system,  PCs can easily vary by close to an order of magnitude in terms of defenses, hit points, and DPS output.  Add to that the ability to create characters that do monstrous damage out to LoS or that do terrible damage outside of melee range, and that can either locate and disarm traps or have to disarm traps by setting them off with their face, and you have a game that nearly necessitates the ability to set your own challenge level. Regardless, DDO does makes me wonder why scalable difficulty isn't a thing in more MMOs.  LotRO, the other game from the same studio, apparently even figured out how to implement a similar system with landscape mobs somehow.  If these two mid-tier games with tiny development teams can figure it out, why isn't everyone doing it?

Beyond my preference for the difficulty of normal content,  another issue is difficulty spikes.  Now some variance in difficulty is to be expected, and an occasional challenge can be a nice way to punctuate major story beats.  That is not what I am talking about.  I am talking about a game that has one range of difficulty for the first 100 hours, and then throws in a random five minute segment that is way way outside of that range.  I am talking about something that feels like a turn based RPG with a Street Fighter II Bison fight jammed randomly into it.  Bonus points if  the difficulty spike involves forcing me to play some NPC with completely different mechanics from my normal character.  Double-triple bonus points if getting through that segment is the only way to progress the main story line.   A few nights ago SWTOR hit me with all of those.  

There is an era of content that has aged poorly compared to most of the game, roughly Knights of the Fallen Empire through the end of the traitor flashpoint arc.*  I have a whole post coming on that content from a personal historical perspective, so I won't go into detail here.  But towards the end of it, there is a fight where you are stuck controlling  a walker instead of your actual character.  This walker has completely different controls from not only your character, but also every other walker in the game.**  After having the difficulty variance of the game pretty much exactly where I enjoyed it for more than 100 straight hours of playtime, this fight kicked my ass for close to a solid hour.  After try five or six, I was so ticked off that I almost rage-quit on the spot.***  

Regardless of any other consideration, I think if there is one golden rule of difficulty it's this:  always give your players what you have trained them to expect.  If a player spends 100+ hours in your game experiencing one range of difficulty, that is the level of difficulty they enjoy.  You can have more challenging content available, but you need to warn them that it's coming and give them a way to avoid it if they wish. In other words, make it completely optional. If your game is lovely path wandering its way through forests, fields and meadows, you can't just have a random brick wall in the middle of it.  Even if you hand players a sledgehammer and say "Just grind your way through this to progress, more lovely sights on the other side!", you will have damaged player trust at best and lost them altogether at worst.  

I am continually baffled to see so many game designers screw up this one thing that seems like common sense.  Now I can certainly think of at least ten reasons why this is easy to do without meaning to.  For example, player skill levels vary, and one player's molehill is another's mountain.  But holy cow, in a live service game when you see a ton of players complaining about something, maybe consider addressing it?

*In fact, there is an option in game that will let you skip all of it just by taking a quest on your ship.  It's never a good sign if that many players need a way to skip a big hunk of your game!  I guess adding the skip option is easier than going back and polishing any of it at this point.  Regardless, on my most recent playthrough, I didn't skip the "Knights of" content because I wanted to see how it played differently if you were dating one of the main characters in it.  I could have skipped that fight at any time, but it would have broken the part of the story I was working on and started me out a few months later assuming choices different from the ones my character would have made. While I don't regret playing it all one more time, I will certainly be using the skip option from here on out.  

**For some insane reason there are actually four different segments where you are forced to play a walker instead of your character in this era of content.  The last one is by far the worst of them, and thankfully the last that they ever did.

***I did get it on try six or seven.  The walker has six abilities.  One ability makes the fight fairly easy.  The other five will get you killed over and over again if you try to use them for anything except filler while you wait on the cooldown for the "good ability."  These abilities exist almost entirely as newb traps in the modern game.  To add to the stupidity of it all, you will never encounter mechanics like this anywhere else in the game.  Some game designer lost their damn mind, a team looked at it and said "This is fine", and it remains in the game to this day.  

EQ II Origins looks to be a win for Daybreak

The Everquest II origins server looks like it is going to be a hit for Daybreak.  Two observations lead me to this conclusion. A thread started about the launch over on the MMORPG reddit is surprisingly positive.  You can also read more about the final ruleset there. A well received post on that board is a minor achievement in its own right because, as nearly as I can tell, the people that hang out there hate the vast majority of MMOs. However, another really positive sign in my mind is that players in the beta are so passionate that they have already started up a ruleset specific wiki.   A large community seems to be gelling around this server.  

Of course the real proof will be in what things look like six months from now.  Nearly any MMO can spin up a new server and get huge crowds at launch.  However, it remains to be seen whether players will stick around like they did for the Classic servers in WoW.  I will say that, on reflection, I believe they have chosen the right era.  Far enough back to feel distinct from current servers, but not so far back that really punishing systems like the crafting sub-combines are in.  We are well past the days when anyone is willing to pay a sub fee to play "Second job: the game."

An aside . .

I'm not dead. I even have three half written posts in the wings, one of which is a 2024 view of SWTOR.  As soon as I get to take a breath they will go up (it's been a crazy year for me).  However, this was just such low hanging fruit I couldn't resist a quick post.  I hope your year is going well!

EQ II Origins server: looking forward to a look back

 So in the latest producer's letter, Jen Chan at Daybreak/ Darkpaw games mentions that some time this year EQ II will be releasing an Origins server.  While the details aren't completely nailed down, the idea seems to be a server that mimics the launch era game in all of it's clunky glory.**  I definitely plan to stick my head in just to see how much of what I think I recall from that era was real versus a fever dream created by the fog of memory.

The main thing I remember is how much more insanely complicated crafting was.  You couldn't just craft an item, heck no!  I remember having to craft a sheet of paper, ink and a pen before I could craft so much as a single low quality spell scroll.  Heck, I even have a really vague memory of perhaps having to buy crafted metal nibs to even be able to make a pen, but surely I am mistaken?  I assume that's just something conjured by my brain filling in details based on what the crafting felt like, rather than how it actually worked.  I mean crafting more than three subcombines to make a single spell scroll would just be absurd, wouldn't it?

Regardless, to this day the part of EQ II that gives me the biggest hit of nostalgia is the sound and animations that come up when you are crafting.  When I played the launch era game, 90% of my time was spent crafting spell scrolls.  I was flabbergasted by the depth of it compared to anything else I had played by that point.  I also got quite wealthy selling them on the auction house, at least by launch era standards.   Half of the classes desperately needed them, and the crafting was so absurdly time consuming and repetitive that relatively few players made it past the lowest levels of scribe.

I also recall the combat parts of the game skewing very heavily towards group content.  Even back then I was a devoted soloist.  It didn't take me long to hit a soft wall where I had done all the solo quests I knew how to find, and the only method of progression left to me was heading out to grind random mobs.  I didn't find the prospect very attractive, and so once I got tired of "Scribe: the MMO" I bounced.  

However, the game did have an interesting feel to it that the modern game doesn't quite recapture.  A feeling that the crappy little neighborhood I was in was a real place, that I was in very real danger when I went outside the city, and that I really was a burgeoning craftsman slowly learning a trade and plying my wares.   Despite the modern game being superior in nearly every way that matters to me, I still find my self looking really forward to stepping back in time for a weekend or three.   Heck, maybe older more patient me will even like that clunky slow-paced relic more than younger me did.   

[Edit: Update]

**According to Bhagpuss it will actually be 2006 era Everquest II, by which time at least some of the rough edges of the launch game had been rounded down, including the crafting being much more straightforward than what I recall.  I bounced some time in 2005, and so didn't realize how much the game changed in the first year.  I don't think I played it again until maybe 2008-2009.  

However, I am still looking forward to it. For me personally a lot of what I actually vaguely miss was a random neighborhood of one of the two cities feeling like such an important place.  Each city had three or four neighborhoods that you might start in depending on your race.  They functioned sort of halfway between an older game like EQ where members of a different race might start on a completely different continent,  and a more modern game where everyone, or at least everyone in the same faction, has the same initial starting area.  Either way, I will be checking it out.  If they bring back that weird system where you didn't even pick your final class until level ten or something, so much the better.  Not that late 2004 or 2006 EQ II is a game I would ever be likely to get as heavily invested in as the modern game.

Very late thoughts on Cataclysm coming to Classic

During Blizzcon it was announced that early next year the Classic servers will be moving on to Cataclysm, as I am sure anyone that reads this blog is already well aware.  While likely all but inevitable (crazed ideas like alternate universe classic branches aside), this decision likely ensures that I won't be going back to WoW for another few years. 

It's certainly not because I hated Cataclysm. In fact Cataclysm was probably when I got most heavily invested in WoW overall.  It's literally the only time I managed to hit the cap and not bounce.  In every other era, once I hit the cap and finished farming up all the mounts I cared about I was done.   In Cataclysm, I hit the cap and kept playing for at least another six months.

The main reason I stopped playing WoW a little over a year ago was that Blizzard ticked me off by being terrible to their employees, even for a gaming studio.* Now of course it wasn't something they suddenly started doing, it was just back in 2021 when news of what horrible place it had been all along finally leaked.  Really egregious revelations like "The Cosby Room" completely soured me on the studio.  I kept waiting for some sign that things had improved, but to me announcements and leadership changes always came across as meaningless lip service with little intent behind them. 

That may be getting better now that Microsoft is buying out Activision.  I presume the worst of Blizzard's cultural practices will begin to be somewhat reigned in.  I mean it will still be a large gaming development studio, so it won't be rainbows and kittens.  But it does seem likely they will manage to improve (i.e., move up the abysmal industry norms) to the degree that I could begin to support them financially without moral qualms.

Unfortunately, this is coming a bit too late for me because Cataclysm itself is a barrier.  Despite how reviled the expansion was, I enjoyed it quite a bit in 2010.  However, even ten years on I still feel like I played the PvP to death.**  Added to that, with years of hindsight I can also see that the pre-Cataclysm era of WoW is simply a better game to me.  For me, Lich King was the largest that the "good version" of WoW ever got, and apparently I only have about six more months (at most) to play that version if I want to. 

With hindsight, Cataclysm marked the beginning of the end of the WoW I loved, when the process of gradually simplifying the game began in earnest.  Changes to core systems from Cataclysm on don't feel like fully considered quality-of-life changes, like the ones that came in Burning Crusade and Lich King. Instead, they feel like a fruitless attempt to widen their audience past core MMO players.  For example, talents became simpler and simpler from Cataclysm on, until they got reduced to one choice every five or ten levels.  While that is indeed much easier for a casual player to understand, it also makes most levels incredibly boring.  Your hit points and mana go up, and that's about it. 

Piece-by-piece Blizzard began removing design elements that existed solely to create the illusion of a realistic world with sensible rules. For example, needing learn how to use your weapons and practice with them to be proficient eventually got tossed aside.  Choice of pet for a hunter became almost solely a cosmetic decision.  Missile weapons stopped needing ammo.  Quests to learn new class abilities got pulled.  The process kept going, and by the time I last played retail it felt more like a lobby based dungeon crawler that happened to be embedded in a MMO than a true MMORPG to me. 

I was tempted to go back for Lich King Classic.  I missed it the first time around because I didn't enjoy the endgame of Burning Crusade, and didn't make it back to WoW again until after Cataclysm launched.  However, the revealed awfulness of Blizzard has kept me away recently purely out of protest.  Now I have seemingly missed my chance to level through the Lich King era game for a second time, they will be setting it on fire again in just a few months.

What somewhat surprised me is that Blizzard also has no plans to create any permanent "locked in the Lich King" era servers.  They already have a few servers for the launch era game, I just assumed they would do the same for Lich King since it's so often touted as the best version of WoW.  It's certainly when the game peaked in popularity.   If the base game is going to be post Cataclysm going forward, is it really still Classic? 

At this point the only upcoming version of WoW "Classic" that seems likely to tempt me is Legion.  By all accounts the implementation of Artifacts in it was a lot of fun.  Yet that is surely at least two or three years out.  So it seems like my long absence from WoW is likely to continue even if the culture of the studio does improve once Microsoft takes over. 

*A bar so low that it is already resting comfortably on the floor at most studios!   

**It was a little odd that the one era in which I didn't bounce right off the endgame of WoW was in an expansion that everyone seemed to hate. However, what is especially odd for me is that I spent most of my time at the cap doing PvP for gear.  I'm not super competitive to start with, and  PvP has to be balanced "just so" for me to enjoy it.  I want meaningful and disparate choices on offer, yet I also want all of them to be solidly useful to a team.  If there is a useful but unpopular role I can specialize in, like setting up to defend a spot, so much the better.  Very few MMOs have ever managed that balancing act well to my tastes, and in WoW your PvP specialization options are basically healer, DPS,  more DPS, or Even Moar Deeps.  Yet during the Cataclysm era I did enough PvP to  wrack up the 1000 honorable kills achievement and buy a full set of PvP epics.   I even eventually got the staff I was drooling over in that post.  For me that's a heck of a lot of time spent doing endgame stuff in general in a MMO, much less PvP.  I was clearly enjoying it.

A Field Guide to LBGs: Magic Streets

Lately my main location based games have been Pokémon Go and Jurassic World Alive. There is a post stewing about JAW.  However, I wanted to highlight another game I play every once in a while: Magic Streets.  I've never seen it covered by anyone else, and it hews closer to a PC MMOPRG than any other LBG  I have played.  

Magic Streets, the location based RPG!  At least the splash screen doesn't lie to you with a pretty painting, those ate definitely the graphics.

Magic Streets is a fantasy LBG inspired seemingly heavily by classic Runescape, with a dash of the old PS2 game Shadowhearts in terms of combat mechanics.   Magic Streets is a bit primitive in some ways.  For example, to me the graphics (as you can see) are whatever is the opposite of charming.  However, the game also has a lot of interesting features that I really like: timing mini-game based combat, good depth that isn't overwhelming, tons of loot to dig through, and a skill based character development system that lets you build out for whatever combat style you like. 

Overall I like it a lot better than Orna, which is the only fantasy RPG LBG that anyone ever seems to talk about.  The issue with Orna for me was that it got repetitive very quickly.  Magic streets doesn't have the same depth of classes as Orna, but I find the combat to be a lot more fun.  The combat and other features, like being able to gather crafting mats, has kept me engaged with Magic Streets for much longer than I ever was with Orna.

Here I am wandering around my neighborhood.  The bunny person near me (with his face turned away) is a pet that I think helps me  in a fight.  What trade-offs choosing to level one pet vs another represents I really have no idea.  As you can see the graphics are overall quite primitive.  I suspect it's a conscious style choice to mimic Runescape, which is a MMO that you used to be able to run in a browser even in the 2000s. The NPC in the back sells stuff.  The cave entrance leads to a dungeon where you can fight a series of increasingly stronger mobs for better loot.  The other icons represent mobs you can fight, or NPCs you can rescue (also by fighting mobs). What this screenshot doesn't show are any crafting material nodes, but in general they are quite abundant.  As nearly as I can tell, your ability to harvest mats is limited only by your inventory space and your ability to walk over to a node IRL.

What do you do?  The basic gameplay is to wander around killing monsters to take their loot and gain XP.  However in addition to that, you can train pets that fight along side you, harvest crafting materials, and craft either lots of different types of gear and consumables or create and upgrade buildings in your personal keep.  More on that below.

The character development system is skill based.  As you level up you get points to spend on the attributes of your choice.  There are also simple skill trees to unlock and level up combat abilities.  Note that these screenshots were all taken nearly a year ago, my current character is a bit further along than this.

The character development system is based on allocating points to skills. You have no class, instead you level up abilities that qualify you to use better gear. There are also simple skill trees where you can purchase and level up abilities.  For example, as I am writing this my guy can wear most medium and heavy armor I find,  and is pretty good with big two-handed weapons and missile weapons.  However, he is terrible with more mage-style stuff like magic wands and cloth armor.  The combat skills I have invested in mainly allow me to execute melee attacks that auto-crit for a lot of damage. I can only use one of these attacks two or three times before I have to rest and regenerate mana, but the attacks are pretty close to an "I win" button in a fight where I use one.

When you click on a mob, you get this info screen about it and you can decide whether to attack it.  One way in which it is very different from a real MMO is that mobs will never attack you, it's always your decision.

For me the combat is what really sets the game apart from Orna, the closest LBG competitor I am aware of.  In Orna, you attack pretty much like you would in an old Dragon Quest or Final Fantasy game.  You choose an ability from a menu, and that's about it.  In Magic Streets, the combat is still turn based. But there is also small element of skill, where timing your attack well determines how much damage you do. 

For example, for big two-handed swords when you attack a small circle inside a larger one starts growing.  If you time the attack so that the two circles overlap you do a ton of damage.  Hit the attack too soon and you will do very little damage.  Wait too long, and the attack will miss altogether.  Different weapons have slightly different mechanics to them, but they are all about a timing mini-game.  The closest analogue I am familiar with is the Shadow Hearts series of games on the PS2 from the late 1990s (a reference that I am sure at least no readers whatsoever will instantly get!). 

With this weapon type the circle slowly shrinks, and you try to tap it when the circle is as close as possible to the point in the middle.  Wait too long an the attack will miss.  Hit the circle closely, and you will do massive damage.  Different weapons have slightly different timing based mini-games to use them.  Special attacks, here greyed out because I decided to make a normal attack, use mana (the blue bar) and are guaranteed to do good damage, heal you, or whatever else.  I'm not far enough into the game to really know what the possibilities on offer consist of. 

What is the world like?  The world is filled primarily with random mobs and crafting material nodes, like many many PC MMOs.  Mobs drop a wide variety of gear, most of which you won't be able to use unless you have specialized in the skill it needs.  For example, I can wear a lot of heavy armor and very little cloth. You also have a keep that you can level up and build out however you like.  Mine has some merchants for buying and selling random loot, an alchemist that will give me a free mana potion once a day if I check in, and a camping area where I can rest.  Lots of other building types are available, but I have no idea what most of them might do.  You also have to gather a heck of a lot of wood, rocks, and other stuff to create any building.

When you attack mobs, very often you also rescue an NPC. These can be recruited for your keep in a system I barely understand.  You can also use all the crafting mats you gather to craft your own gear, but I get so much random gear as drops that I am a bit fuzzy on why you would ever bother with that. You will quickly murder all the monsters nearby if you don't go walking around.  You can't just sit in your living room and grind your brains out like Orna.

You can see the keeps of other players out on the landscape.  However, the game doesn't appear to be all that popular.  Only a few people in my entire neighborhood seemingly play.  

Loot is abundant, and comes in the standard array of MMO rarities from gray common gear to rare and powerful epic gear.  One of the main reason to level up skills is so that you can use different pieces of gear.  I spent a ton of points on missile weapons so I could use this shuriken, and it paid off.  I immediately became much stronger, able to quite easily take down mobs I was struggling with before.

Asynchronous interactions.  You can enter the keeps of other players and buy and sell stuff. There also appears to be some PvP system where you can attack someone's keep and try to loot it.  However I haven't attempted this.  The few keeps I could have attacked had high level guards that likely would have made short work of me.  My keep hasn't been attacked even once since I have been playing.  Whether this is because there is some flag I haven't set, because I'm too low level, or because my neighbors are polite I can't really say. 

How do you interact with other players? As nearly as I can tell this is quite limited. If there is a way to form parties or hook up and do a raid, or collaborate to clear a dungeon, I haven't figured it out yet. I assume there is some kind of guild system, but I haven't found it yet if there is.

In addition to dropped loot, wandering NPC merchants sell items.  There is also a blacksmith in my keep that has a bunch of random gear when I check in with him.  However I mainly use him to break the gear I don't want down into crafting mats.  It takes a lot of wood and rocks to upgrade an Inn, I'm not going to let the handle of an axe dropped by an ogre just go to waste!

Is it good exercise?  As I said above, you will exhaust everything within striking distance of you fairly quickly if you don't walk around.  However, I find that by the time I have cleared out my yard, or the parking lot of a doctor's office, or whatever, I am satisfied with my progress.  If I want more stuff to do where I am, generally I'll switch over to Pokémon Go instead of walking anywhere. 

I can imagine that if you really got into the crafting and building aspects, it would be to great advantage to walk around your neighborhood looking for crafting mats to harvest.  There doesn't appear to be any way to get stuff to respawn quickly, or any way to move to a new location short of actually walking there.  If I were more deeply invested in the game, it might be very good exercise indeed. 

This is the 5th post in a series on Location Based Games.  Here are the others:

Overview

Pokémon Go

Walking Dead Our World (sadly shuttered earlier this year)

Orna

What is a MMORPG, and why does it matter to me so much?

I think many if not most online multiplayer games have become MMOs in the broad sense.  To me MMORPG is a narrower concept, and seems to be the pretty much the same thing that Tipa means when she says MMO in this recent thought provoking post.  I articulated "everything is a MMO, MMORPGs are different" much more fully in a post here a few years ago.  However, I inadvertently typed 99% of a blog post in the response to Tipa's post, and I have never really explored where I feel the limits of MMORPGs here.  So here we go!

To me what distinguishes a MMO from a MMORPG is not really any particular mechanics but a design sensibility.  If the one of the central design goals is to create the illusion of a shared fantasy world (or fictional world in general), with at least some of the expected entertainment coming from social interactions with other avatars being run by players (even if indirect like an AH or looking at other player's outfits when you run through town) it's a MMORPG. It's more of a "I know it when I see it" than a hard limit, and any two observers might disagree on the edge cases.  But if there is a straight line in the design history from the game to UO or EQ (or a MUD) I likely consider a game a MMORPG.   

Social interaction is also key. The only way to experience the game has to be to hang out in at least some areas where other people you don't know could also choose to play.  It's kind of like when you decide to leave your house and go to a store.  You might not see anyone, but you certainly could and it isn't your choice.  The only way to physically shop in the store is to take that risk.  The only way to play a MMOPRG is to engage in shared social spaces that could, and in fact almost certainly do, have total strangers in them.  

However that is far from enough, or Fortnight would be a MMORPG.  Fortnight is definitely not a MMORPG to me, and the main reason is that design goal of the game is different.  Some edge-case examples might give a better idea of where I am coming from.

To me DDO and Guild Wars 1 are edge cases, because the only areas that aren't instanced are villages, cities and keeps that lead either directly to quest instances or to wilderness areas that lead to more quest instances.  However a major design goal is to create the illusion of a shared world inhabited both by yourself and other player characters, so I tend to include them.  Diablo I-III don't count in my mind because you can get to the hub areas offline. It's by design that you don't have to fool with other players if you don't want to. Same with PSO, and any number of survival games like Arc Survival Evolved.  However,  a particular server of Arc that is always up and has a lot of players comes really close to being a MMORPG in my mind.  Especially if it has more active players than can be logged on at once.

Second Life is another edge case, but I wouldn't include it because the original design goal is not to create the illusion any specific fictional world.  The only reason I consider even an edge case that games made by users are now embedded in it, making a kind or proto-metaverse.  Location based games are yet another edge case, but I don't include them because our world is so integral to them.  I am on pretty shaky ground there with Orna or Magic Streets I will allow.  However, I consider LBGs in general something new.  

RPG is also a necessary part to me, but almost everything seems to have some RPG mechanics such as XP and levels these days, so presence of RPG mechanics is not all that useful by itself.  But in what I think of as a MMORPG the mechanics are there at least in part to help make the world feel more fleshed out, kind of like in a PnP RPG.  They aren't there purely to give players more things to grind towards. 

All this is a very long winded way of saying I consider MMORPGs a specific genre with fuzzy edges.  All bloggers and commentators seem to agree on what's in the middle, and there will probably never be a huge amount of agreement about where the exact edges are.  

Whatever a MMOPRG is is though, it's a genre that's really special to me.  They are a lot more enchanting and "sticky"  than almost any other type of game.  For me they have an indefinable magic that really makes them pop.  It's a genre that hints at endless possibilities to me.  However, it's a genre  that also often makes me somewhat wistful, because I believe the potential will almost certainly never be fully realized by any design team.  I'm not sure whether that's possible, even in theory, for a single game. 

That said, I certainly love seeing how different teams of designers have taken a crack at it!  Doing so most of my adult life has led to a series of fascinating journeys.